June 2008
Search    

Concerns with FM 1-52 testing | Tech Today

Tech Today not ratednot ratednot ratednot ratednot rated

Concerns with FM 1-52 testing

FM 1-52 faces problems related to inappropriate use and result variability

by Mark S. Graham
Be the first to comment


FM Global recommends performing field uplift testing as a quality-assurance measure on most membrane roof systems in hurricane-prone regions of the U.S. NRCA has concerns about whether FM Global's test method provides an accurate prediction of quality installation and actual uplift performance.

For buildings located in hurricane-prone regions where the design wind speed is 100 mph or greater, FM Global recommends to its insurers that acceptance of and final payment for most new membrane roof systems be based on satisfactory completion of a field uplift test. In the U.S., this recommendation applies along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts and in American Samoa, Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

The FM test

FM Global recommends such testing be conducted according to Loss Prevention Data Sheet 1-52 (FM 1-52), "Field Uplift Tests." FM 1-52 provides two methods of testing membrane roof systems: bonded uplift...



To read the article in its entirety, please log in or register (registration is free).

Log in or register for FREE access to this article and other Professional Roofing online content.

Not a professionalroofing.net user?

Register now for free access
  • Full access to every article
  • Online Web exclusive information
  • Photo gallery
  • Breaking news
  • Online classified ads

Already a professionalroofing.net user?

Log in now

User name:

Password:

 




Comments (0) Login to post a comment or rating
There are no comments posted.

NRCA NRCA