June 2008
Search    

Be sure you're paid

Be sure you're paid not ratednot ratednot ratednot ratednot rated

Recent court cases benefiting bond claimants have prompted the continued use of AIA's A312 form

by Brian P. McCormick
Be the first to comment


Since its promulgation in 1984, The American Institute of Architects' (AIA's) A312 payment bond form has been widely used throughout the construction industry. However, three recent court decisions in Florida, Maryland and Virginia interpreting A312's claim response requirements have prompted the bonding industry to campaign against A312's continued use.

The heart of the controversy concerning A312 is the language that requires a surety to "[s]end an answer to the Claimant, with a copy to the Owner, within 45 days after receipt of the claim, stating the amounts that are undisputed and the basis for challenging any amounts that are disputed."

Although the three court cases differ in many respects, in each of them the subcontractor was able to recover against the surety because the surety waived certain defenses to the subcontractor's claim by failing to provide the required response within the 45-day period prescribed in A312. Had the sureties responded as required or raised these defenses within the 45-day period, they would have been able to raise them in opposition to the subcontractors' claims.



To read the article in its entirety, please log in or register (registration is free).

Log in or register for FREE access to this article and other Professional Roofing online content.

Not a professionalroofing.net user?

Register now for free access
  • Full access to every article
  • Online Web exclusive information
  • Photo gallery
  • Breaking news
  • Online classified ads

Already a professionalroofing.net user?

Log in now

User name:

Password:

 


Login help
Click here to have your user name and password emailed to you.




Comments (0) Login to post a comment or rating
There are no comments posted.

NRCA NRCA